Home > Destinations > Central
America > Belize > Regional
News >
Belize Dam Fight Turns Nasty, would destroy wild Macal
Thursday, November 01, 2001
Belize Dam Fight Turns Nasty, would destroy wild Macal
From The Reporter Belize Newspaper
Robert Kennedy, Jr. has joined environmentalists from Belize, Canada and the United States to alert Canadian shareholders to plans by the Canadian company Fortis to flood Belize's Macal River Valley, one of the wildest places remaining in Central America.
Kennedy and other leading environmentalists urged the power company's shareholders to vote against the proposed Chalillo plan. Speakers at a recent stockholder's meeting presented evidence to show that the Fortis' dam is a bad deal for the environment, a bad deal for the economy of Belize and an international embarrassment for Canada.
The environmental lobby comprised Robert Kennedy Jr. of the Natural Resources Defense Council, Jamillah Vasquez of the Belize Alliance of Conservation NGOs, Sharon Matola of the Belize Zoo, Greg Malone, Newfoundland hydro activist, Elizabeth May of the Sierra Club of Canada and Ginne Ryder of Probe International. They met with Fortis shareholders recently at the Toronto Stock Exchange Conference Center Executive Boardroom located at 130 King St., Toronto, Ontario where they distributed campaign material, as well as photos of wildlife threatened by the dam. Post-conference interviews with the speakers were also arranged.
Fortis Inc., a billion-dollar Canadian corporation traded on the Toronto Stock Exchange, is the majority owner of Belize Electricity Limited, which wants to flood an extensive stretch of Belize's Macal River Valley.
Fortis President and CEO, Stanley Marshall, has announced that Fortis is ready to start building the $45 million hydro dam in January 2002, even though the company's own wildlife consultant, the Natural History Museum of London, has recommended that the dam not be built. The consultants' study, paid for by the Canadian government, concludes that the dam will cause "significant and irreversible" harm to more than a dozen rare or endangered species, including the jaguar, the freshwater crocodile, the howler monkey, and the Scarlet Macaw. The Fortis' dam would also flood ancient Maya archaeological sites.
But the most telling argument, for Belizeans at least, is that Belizean rate-payers will have to subsidize the high cost of the dam by paying higher rates. Environmentalists are especially inflamed by Fortis' refusal to meet with them for further discussions about the dam. Fortis informed a citizens group in Canada that "no further meetings are necessary." Fortis also made a general announcement that it is ready to start dam construction at Chalillo in January 2002.
The environmental lobby points out that it has new evidence that the proposed dam is not economic; that the Fortis monopoly will allow the company "to gouge captive Belizean ratepayers in order to pay for the dam's high costs." Environmentalists also point to the fact that the Natural History Museum of London advises that the dam at Chalillo should not be built because it would cause "significant and irreversible harm" to Belizean wildlife.
As the time-frame for ground-breaking approaches, Fortis finds itself fending off fiercer attacks from the environmentalist lobby. The latest blast, which aims squarely at Fortis' shareholder power-base, states: "We believe that Mr. Marshall has misled the public and Fortis shareholders by claiming on CBC radio that his company would abandon the dam project if the Canadian environmental assessment found that it would cause untoward damage to the environment. Despite that assurance, Fortis is now preparing to proceed, in spite of the fact that its own wildlife consultant, the Natural History Museum of London, has concluded that this is precisely what the dam will do.
For more background on the campaign to stop Fortis and save the Macal River Valley, the coalition has prepared a website at http://www.stopfortis.org
